• Industry & Legislative Resources

  • Appendix D: Fire Apparatus Access Roads (Section D107)

    Send letters of support for the removal of Fire Appendix D from the Code to secretary@dps.ny.gov by September 10. A public hearing is being held on Thursday, September 5 at 99 Washington Avenue in Albany. Members are encouraged to attend. 

     

    NYSBA suggests the following verbiage:

    Clearly when the fire accessibility codes were drafted, they were written to address the concerns of firefighters. But the authors had little or no knowledge of other rules that govern the design of roadways and intersections. Consequently compliance with Appendix D can potentially result in conflicts with other regulations and design criteria. For example, the requirement for a second access road based on the dimension of a parcel diagonals, could place intersections too close to other existing intersections- both adjacent and offset intersections. Separations are required to give drivers time for decision making when intersection movements potentially place vehicles in conflict with one another.
     
    Appendix D also gives no consideration to the sight distances along horizontal and vertical curves. Intersections need to be located where drivers entering roads have sufficient visibility along these roads to see vehicles approaching at speed. This is necessary to ensure that drivers have sufficient time to safely enter the roadway. Simply requiring and locating additional access points because of the number of homes in a neighborhood and the dimensions of the parcel being developed – without regard to other critical safety design standards – does not protect the public. To the contrary, it can place the public in harm’s way.
     
     

    Prevailing Wage in Residential Construction Talking Points 

    S. 1947 (Ramos)/ A. 1261 (Bronson) 

    • Proposed legislation would apply prevailing wage laws to many residential construction and improvement projects which were previously not within the definition of public work. 
    • According to separate studies by the Empire Center, and the Citizens Housing Planning Council, New York State's prevailing wage law drives up total construction costs by 13 to 25 percent, depending on the region. 
    • According to the Citizens Housing Planning Council, there is no evidence that imposing prevailing wages would improve construction quality.
    • Proposed legislation defines public work so broadly as to encompass construction of private residential buildings, which are assisted only indirectly by government. 
    • Prevailing wage rates include expensive union fringe benefits, which can approach or exceed the cost of hourly pay. 
    • Proposed legislation could require prevailing wage on any of the following:
      • Local real property tax abatement or exemption
      • State agency bonds issued under Federal tax exemption rules
      • Guarantees through SONYMA insurance on State agency bonds which provide credit enhancement to attract private investors in apartment construction or rehabilitation
      • IDA pilots
      • Community Development Block Grants
      • Housing and Community Renewal grants o Historic tax credits
      • Mortgage recording taxes
      • NYSERDA clean energy grants
      • NYSERDA tax credits 
      • Sales tax exemptions
      • Brownfield tax credits
    • No sound public policy reason has been put forward to justify the extension of prevailing wages to private residential construction.

    • Construction costs are not just important, but are the determining factor between whether or not a particular affordable workforce home is built or rental unit rehabilitated.

    • The imposition of prevailing wage rules on such activities will impose crippling cost burdens and difficult administrative procedures and expose small contractors and homebuilders to aspects of contracting practices encountered in large public works projects.

    • Prevailing wage requirements would negatively impact affordable housing throughout the state.

    • State and local government construction project costs are already bloated and inflated. Private construction should not be.

    Respond to NYSBA's Call for Action and tell the legislature you OPPOSE prevailing wage in residential construction!

  • Scaffold Law Reform

    What Is It? 

    The Scaffold Law, (Labor Law 240/241) was first enacted in the late 19th century. It holds property owners, employers, and contractors ABSOLUTELY LIABLE for ‘gravity-related’ injuries that happen on the job. That means there is virtually no defense from a lawsuit, even if the worker’s gross negligence contributed to the accident. Even parties that had no supervisory control over the work are held liable.

    Click here for quick facts on Scaffold Law Reform.

    What can you do?

    Sign the letter of support for Scaffold Law Reform. To add your signature to the letter, send a JPG of your signature along with your name and company name to Jason Cintron at jcintron@lrany.org, Grassroots ManagerLawsuit Reform Alliance of New York.